The biggest award show in Hollywood has finally released their nominations and like every year, there are some major oversights, along with some pleasant surprises that many could not have seen coming. Before diving into the major categories, I want to shed some light on great films that I didn’t expect to pick up smaller nominations.
The first Oscars award ceremony took place in 1928, in Los Angeles California. A few awards that were won that night were, Best Actor went to Emil Jannings for the movie The Last Command. Best director went to Lewis Milestone for the movie Two Arabian Knights. This year in 2018 will mark the 90th anniversary, which is taking place in Los Angeles California; Hosted by Jimmy Kimmel.
I, Tonya tells the life story of Tonya Harding, player by Margot Robbie, Olympic figure skater and first female American in history to land a triple axel. The film gives plenty of background to Harding’s early life, having to live with an overbearing and abusive mother, Lavona Harding, played by Allison Janney.
What do you think the best Christmas movie is? Everyone has a different opinion on what the best Christmas movie is. The only movies that should be considered the best are, Elf ( 2003 ), A Christmas Story ( 1983 ), Home Alone 1 & 2 ( 1990 & 1992 ), National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation ( 1989 ), A Charlie Brown Christmas ( 1965 ), The Polar Express ( 2004 ), The Grinch ( 2000 ), The Santa Clause ( 1994 ), A Christmas Carol ( 2009 ). Out of those 10 movies, Rotten Tomatoes rated, A Charlie Brown Christmas at 92%.
Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri is the first film of 2017 that I can call amazing. With so many big releases this year ranging from average to disappointing, it feels great to walk out of a theater nearly 100% satisfied. Three Billboards centers around Mildred Hayes, played by Frances McDormand, who’s daughter was raped and murdered nearly a year ago. After seven months of silence from the local police Mildred, still obviously recovering from the loss of her daughter, takes it upon herself to put the case back in the public eye. Mildred buys up three run down billboards and plasterers the messages, “raped while dying.” “and still no arrests.” and “How come, Chief Willoughby?” This obvious sparks outrage in the quiet town of Ebbing, Missouri from not only the local police, but also everyday citizens. That is all I want to give away.
I movie like this comes along once in a lifetime, something this spectacular deserves to be on constant loop in a museum. Loving Vincent is a film about a man trying to piece together the strange series events surrounding the death of Vincent Van Gogh, animated using over 65,000 oil paintings. The film took over 8 years and around 100 artist to make, and the final product is unbelievable. Walking into this film I already knew the story behind this film and I had one major concern before the movie started. I was considered that by around the halfway point my eyes would adjust to the oil painting animation and the film would lose its initial magic. Luckily, every moment of Loving Vincent was just as incredibly as the opening shot, and half the time I couldn’t believe what I was watching. The never before seen visuals are obviously the film’s main draw, but unlike 2013’s Gravity or 2009’s Avatar, Loving Vincent still has plenty of merit if seen outside of the theater.
The film opens up with a man named Armand Roulin, getting drunk late one night at a local bar. His clearly disappointed father finds him and sits him down for a talking to. It’s revealed the Armand’s father, Joseph Roulin, was not only Van Gogh’s personal postman, but good friend. Joseph entrusts his son with a letter written by Vincent to his brother Theo Van Gogh, however even a whole year after Vincent’s death the letter still hasn’t been delivered due to all previous attempts failing. By the request of his father Armand sets out to deliver the letter personally and slowly discovers that their was much more to the late artist’s story than he could have possible imagined. Armand bounces around to several different people who live in the small town where Vincent died and knew him personally. Once more and more people open up to Armand about their experiences with the artist, stories start to conflict and it’s clear someone in the town is lying about the past.
Some have criticized the film for taking place so far after Van Gogh’s death, focusing on the character of Armand and using flashbacks to recount the past, I think it provides a different context to the film. While it was no secret many people saw Van Gogh as psychotic freak when he was alive and now see him as an artistic genius, Loving Vincent shows this shift in perspective did not happen overnight. In fact, Armand’s journey through the life of Van Gogh and his change in attitude toward the painter likely mirrors many individuals evolving perception of Van Gogh during the early 1900s. By focus the story around Armand and not giving Van Gogh 100% of the spotlight, the film has an added layer that many biopics don’t have. Loving Vincent also has the most interesting end credits of any film I’ve ever seen. Not only giving the audience a brief epilogues for each of the main characters, but also showing side by side images of the real life actors that were used as models and their animated counterparts. Providing a great behind the scenes tidbit on how this visual spectacle came to be.
None of the performances stuck out to me as terrible, but Douglas Booth as Armand Roulin, Chris O’Dowd as Joseph Roulin and Robert Gulaczyk as Van Gogh himself were the clear standouts. The ending sequence with Armand and Joseph looking out into the night sky while reading Van Gogh’s last letter to his beloved brother is a bittersweet image that will stick with me for long time and not just because of the gorgeous animation. The cast is a lot larger than I expected from the trailers, and this can actually cause some confusion as an almost overwhelming number of characters are introduced each with their own stories and relations to Van Gogh. The film even contains two female characters that look a little too similar, which was likely done to be more faithful to the real life events, but ends up just making the plot harder to follow at times. So while I definitely enjoyed this adaptation of Van Gogh’s life story, it does pain me to say that the film is not without some major faults.
Loving Vincent as a whole just feels too slow and the moments of truly captivating story are few are far between. The whole film is only an hour and 35 minutes which is definitely on the shorter end of the spectrum in term of movie length, but it certainly feels a lot longer. Some scenes were perfection both in animation and writing, especially the ending, but I just wish the whole kept me that engaged. The story just needed to move faster and while this might have caused the film to fall well below a standard run time for a feature length film, Loving Vincent could have made a truly amazing short film or more preferably, a full length film with just with more story elements like Van Gogh’s childhood or just more information about his fascinating life. This criticism got me wondering if it wasn’t for the beautiful visuals, would this film be receiving any praise at all?
I have struggled with this question for a while before coming to the conclusion that the story, characters and writing were just good enough to make the film work as a whole, with or without the oil paint animation. However, I would be lying if I said this film would get the same amount of attention had it been live action. Walking out of the theater I thought I had just seen one of the best films of the year, and as I’ve sat on it more I realized that the slow pace and occasional boredom had a much bigger effect on my overall enjoyment that I previously thought. This is most likely thanks to the ending, which like I said is by far the most impactful moment in the entire film. All things considered, the visual are the biggest selling point and while that will likely keep this film from becoming a classic, it doesn’t mean you shouldn’t immediately seek in out in theaters or at home if you have a nice big TV. Loving Vincent is the most beautiful film I have ever seen, I just wish the story and pacing was as spectacular.
The Foreigner: Jackie Chan Vs. Pierce Brosnan Is a Match Made In Heaven, but It Bites Off More Than It Can Chew.
I was ecstatic when I learned that Jackie Chan was finally returning to Hollywood for the first time since the surprisingly enjoyable and emotional 2010 Karate Kid remake. After several films that never made their way outside of China, a new, wide release, R rated, Jackie Chan action film sounded incredibly promising. The trailers sold the film as the story of Jackie Chan desperately trying to get revenge on the IRA terrorists that were responsible for the death of his daughter and focusing his efforts on Irish deputy minister and former leader of the Provisional IRA, Liam Hennessy, played by Pierce Brosnan, who Chan believes is hiding information from the public. However, the film is much more complicated than just a simple revenge story, which ends up being a blessing and curse for The Foreigner.
Battle of the Sexes: Two Fantastic Leads Almost Make Up For The Fact That I Didn’t Get The Film I Signed Up For.
I had been looking forward to Battle of the Sexes ever since I saw the first trailer. A biopic centered around one the most viewed tennis matches in history doesn’t sound incredibly exciting at first, especially if you’re not a huge sports fan. However, when the match was between the current female champion Billie Jean King and former male tennis star Bobby Riggs, a lot of layers are added to the story. Not to mention the fact that recent Oscar winner, Emma Stone, and experienced comedic and dramatic actor Steve Carell were taking up the lead roles. By all accounts this film should have been nearly perfect, and while I definitely enjoyed myself, the pacing was off, the finale didn’t have the impact it needed, and ultimately it wasn’t the film that the trailers promised.
Kingsman: The Golden Circle An Incredibly Fun, Action Packed, Over the Top Sequel That Feels a Little Crowded.
The first Kingsman film taglined, The Secret Service, was released in 2014 with director Matthew Vaughn, known for 2010’s Kick-Ass and 2011’s X-Men: First Class, truly came out of nowhere. Despite being based on a beloved Graphic Novel, you would be hard pressed to find someone would knew of its existence before the film’s release. However, this lack of brand recognition actually helped Kingsman more than hurt it. With expectations relatively low, many audience members were not expecting one of the best spy-comedies in decades.